Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re:MOTM-compliant modules now...to Mr Suit&Tie...

From: "earthtodylan2000" <sir_dss@...>
Date: 2008-05-01

Mr. S&T

Hmmm... They sound like they would fit better in a Moog system then.

When I was asking about MOTM format I should of kept it to the paint, knobs. Jack grids
get a pass in my book.

Is the "MOTM compliant" modules the same for .com systems as well?

Dave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Scott_Stone
http://www.myspace.com/sirdsssound





--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Suit & Tie Guy <erwill@...> wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:40 PM, earthtodylan2000 wrote:
> > exciting in the world of MOTM. I've been checking out yr. modules
> > over the last year or so
> > and they look rad.
>
> thanks very much.
>
> > I was wondering just how close the panels are to the MOTM
> > format...does the paint match
> > Paul's?
>
> these panels are manufactured using a photo-aluminum process nearly
> identical to the Moog systems on the 1960s, and therefore do not use
> any paint in the manufacturing process. it is an anodised aluminum
> finish whose artwork is rated to over 10 years of direct solar
> radiation and as such is certified for exterior legending on the
> International Space Station. outdoors on planet earth they wouldn't
> fade for 60 years. if used indoors they will never fade, and the
> artwork will never rub off .. though they can be scratched.
>
> these are logistically MOTM-compliant: they fit in MOTM-19A rails
> with 8-32 3/4" machine screws and use a 4-position MTA-156 header for
> 15 volt power. they will not match for finish or fonts, and violate
> the MOTM knobs-and-jacks grid.
> ---
> Suit & Tie Guy
> suitandtieguy.com
> stgsoundlabs.com
>