Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Update (motm-480)

From: loopcycle <loopcycle@...>
Date: 2008-03-03

I'm still learning the 480, but it definitely changes character depending on
the input signal amplitude, just as the 440 does. Because it has two outputs,
one of them can easily be patched back into an input for feedback tweakiness.
(Reminder to self: mult the 440 output and feed it back to itself, and compare
the character with the 480.) I made a one-pass recording with three voices,
the third voice (which comes in somewhere around 2:30) uses the 480--its the
voice with the pingpong delay. I fly in feedback during the recording. Maybe
this will give you just a little hint of the character of the 480, although its
pretty low in the mix.

[I really need to do another pass at this patch, but here it is:]

http://www.twango.com/media/YouFeel.public/YouFeel.10063




--- Girts R <boss@...> wrote:


> Or just say something good about MOTM-480. Will it track 1V/oct input better
> than
> MOTM-440? :) does the input level make significant changes to the resonance
> character?
> has anyone tried two of them in stereo mode (especially in bandpass mode with
> one input
> for both but slightly differrent frequency tracking and with one modulation
> source for both
> ), any new dimensions appear? Or this trick is not good for
> non-self-oscillating filters?
> What if using this filter without vca at the end - will it be silent enough
> (for example the
> MOTM-440 is OK for me in that regard)?



____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs