On Wed, 23 May 2007, John Mahoney wrote:
> I'm not suggesting that Paul adopt Roger's approach. More like I'm
> wondering what the MOTM community thinks of it.
To use the ever-popular automotive analogy, it's like a modern
BMW versus a Series LandRover. The former tries to be a
perfect artifact but repair is expensive and difficult, the
latter has frequent issues but is trivial to repair. And
oddly, while the BMW has stranded me the LR tries to but always
manages to come home. (And some would say the modern LR
manages to combine the worst of both worlds...)
m
--
Monty Brandenberg