Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Awesome

From: Larry David <larrydavid777@...>
Date: 2006-10-31

I didn't appreciate reading that either, though in James' defense, it
was in his signature (IIRC) and it is generally accepted practice to
put whatever silly thing you want in your sig. For my part, I
consider it trolling to have such a provocative sig. Maybe it is a
joke - it is silly enough to be one - but it is trolling either way,
IMHO.

As for the rest of your post Kenneth; I feel your pain - but things
have always been this way. It used to be the scientists that were
truth-seekers and often silenced for asking the wrong questions.
Ironically, the tables have turned and it is the scientists who all
too often silence questioners. But this is just human nature. We
think we are so smart, yet we have never learned the lesson that "he
who thinks he has everything figured out is the greatest fool".

ld


On Oct 29, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Kenneth Elhardt wrote:

> James Elliott writes:
>>> BUT OUR GOVERNMENT SUCKS!!!! Soon we are all going to have to start
> worshiping our "leaders" if we don't vote for change. Get rid of ALL
> incumbants!!...Sorry, I meant the United States of America; and the
> government I was referring to are the losers governing said
> country. VOTE
> FOR CHANGE FELLOW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AMERICANS!!!<<
>
> Interesting. String theory, anti-gravity, and now politics and
> political
> bashing are okay for the this list. Yet answer one little comment
> somebody
> made about the scientific theory of evolution, and then some people
> falsely
> recatagorize it as a religious or political theory and make a big
> deal about
> it, yet oddly remain silent here. Too much.
>
> One day I have a dream that this list..., wait, a dream is a 3D
> movie that
> plays in your head when you're asleep and the existance of dreams
> makes no
> sense according to the theory of evolution. Guess that makes dreams
> religious. Oh well. Let's be sure never to mention them on this list
> either.
>
> -Elhardt