Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: MOTM-510 usage

From: "Mike Marsh" <michaelmarsh@...>
Date: 2006-10-11

I ∗think∗ if I've read this right that the 510 is generating LFO speed
signals since it is being fed by the 120...?

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Tom. These are interesting, even if I don't know what a
> Roland JD-800 or a Korg EMX are. I am a little confused about the
> patch. You write, typically:
>
> Audio: JD-800 -> MOTM-120 -> MOTM-510 -> MOTM-410
> CV: MOTM-510 (full out) -> MOTM-410 (rate)
>
> I know it is hard to describe a patch in words.
>
> Does this mean that you are using the MOTM-510 Audio Out as the
input to
> the MOTM-410, and Full Out of the same MOTM-510 as a control input to
> the MOTM-410? If that's the case, I don't understand it, because the
> MOTM-410 rate input controls the rate of the internal LFO's. I'm not
> sure what it means to control an LFO rate with an audio frequency
> signal. Perhaps the modulating signal feeds through somehow. I'll
have
> to try it. (See, this is my theoretical mind, the mind that normally
> does not think to modulate an LFO rate with a high frequency control.
> In the case you modulate the MOTM-410 DEPTH with the 510 output, since
> that is a VCA the control signal would mix through. But you only used
> that with the TBE-Sound04.
>
> Does it make much difference to the sound if you disconnect the
MOTM-510
> Full Out from the 410 CV inputs?
>
> -Richard Brewster
> http://www.pugix.com
>
>
> Tom Adam wrote:
> > Oeps....
> >
> > http://users.pandora.be/the-big-ear/temp/TBE-samples.pdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>