Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] RE: Vanilla versus double pecan ripple fudge

From: "Wheaton, Simon" <simon.wheaton@...>
Date: 2006-10-03

Re: [motm] RE: Vanilla versus double pecan ripple fudge
Yep, synthesizers.com is boring, looks like MOTM is headed in that same direction.
 
You give many reasons why what you are doing is all wrong and needs to be changed, then you say you are #2 and must be doing something right.
 
I have not been able to support MOTM as much as I'd like, but I'm concerned that when I can afford to, there will not be the interesting MOTM modules available that I'd like to use.
 
I guess I'm the only one that has these thoughts, as noboday else wants to voice their opinion if they are thinking the same, so I'll drop it.
 
Simon
Canberra
AUSTRALIA
From: Paul Schreiber
Sent: Tue 3/10/2006 3:59 PM

I think that with the sale, the ∗8 months∗ of lead time, and the fact that new
customers are buying more each day (4 new customers in the last 5 days). Look at
synthesizers.com: except for the 960 clone, what new stuff has Roger had in 3
years? What new stuff has Sege had in ...errr...22 years?

Since I outsold Moog 18 months ago, and MOTM is #2 all-time installed base
(behind Doepfer), I must be doing ∗something∗ right :)

Paul S.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------