Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [motm] Replacement for MOTM-450

From: John Laudicina <gion2archery@...>
Date: 2006-07-14

This is all MOOT,
Paul can do what ever he wants to do, it is his idea
and business. I for one am on a budget for my modular
needs, this is why I went kits. Even at kit prices
the dot com stuff is much cheaper... but so is the
quality. Myself I prefer the MOTM and I will stay
Motm, if the prices get too steep for me I just will
have to buy less and be more choosey than I am now.
In my business (commercial Photographer) I get people
who say I am very expensive and I am compared to the
average shooter. But you get what you pay for. I am
an artist just like some of the musicians on this
list, dont you hate to be chisseled? So why are you
busting Pauls Balls????? oh that rhymed.

And Ken... what is going on with your patch book
series?????

I for one enjoyed it.

John

--- Kenneth Elhardt <elhardt@...> wrote:

> Mike Estee writes:
> >>That stuborness is one of the reasons I'm a motm
> customer. It's the
> commitment to signal path quality. Sure, I could get
> the doepfer modules,
> but sometimes I don't like hearing my clock
> line/powersupply/evening news
> in my signal path. I'd rather paul ditched a module
> than his principles.<<
>
> It's not the electronics part that I'm talking
> about. As Paul said, that's
> only about %25 of the cost. It's expensive knobs
> and pots, or whatever is
> pushing the thing to the point where people don't
> want to spend the money.
> Tony from Encore Electronics for instance, puts 15
> pots and knobs on the UEG
> using a completely different system, and it seems
> like maybe a better way to
> go for higher knobcount type stuff. And a lot
> faster to build to boot.
> Won't need to go 3U wide either even at 15 or more
> bands, which is what I
> think the 450 should have been to begin with. (If
> the 450 was going to be
> 3U, can't remember). Paul has already ditched some
> of his principles by
> going fracrack, so let's maybe continue that trend a
> bit further. :-)
>
> -Elhardt
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com