Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
  topic list next in topic

Subject: Thoughts on the new direction

From: David Cornutt <cornutt@...>
Date: 2006-07-08

I have to admit that I'm a bit disappointed about the elimination of
the kits.
However, maybe there are other ways to achieve some of the objectives.
One of the reason I like kits is so I can do mods as I build. And it
helps
greatly that MOTM modules are so throughly documented.

But SMT and tight layouts make hacking difficult. So here's my
suggestion:
as the new modules are designed, bring certain key signal input and
output
points out to headers or jumpers. This will give the DIY'er
opportunities to
reroute signals, add additional controls, external circuitry, etc.

I do think the AudioEngine is a cool concept. My suggestion on this:
would it
be possible to create a Chameleon-like module that allows for some user
programming? I'll have to admit I'm not sure how this should work; I
kind of
had the idea that the Xilinx would be programmed with some kind of
simple
DSP core, where the user could write processing code in, say, C and
download
it to the module via serial, JTAGS, or maybe MIDI. Non-volatile memory
would allow for code retention with the power off (and the
possibility of
being able to store several programs and select them with a front panel
switch), so that once loaded the module can be disconnected from the
computer, for live use or just to get the computer out of the picture.

And yes, I will have to admit that I'm one of those who haven't ordered
anything in a while. But I think I have a pretty good excuse: my
spouse and
I are building a house; our builder abandoned the job and we are having
to finish the house ourselves and pay for everything with credit cards.
Right now, I'm so close to my credit limit that I can't even order a
power
distribution board!