uh, I meant ∗generally∗...
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <michaelmarsh@...> wrote:
>
> What Adam said, except that I do stereo all the time with one 410: Out
> 1 panned to the left, 2 center, and 3 to the right. Do what you want
> with Mix out (I geberally ping-pong it). This is a GREAT way to get a
> beautiful spread from a single patch, particularly with the mode
> switch in the DUAL position...I ∗love∗ the 480, but if I had to
> choose, it would be the 410 by a hair.
>
> Mike
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Schabtach" <adam@> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW: I have all of the filters that you list. I really like both
> the 410
> > and the 480, and it would be hard to choose one over the other. The
> 410 is
> > unique among the MOTM filters because of its triple-BP topology; the
> 480 is
> > possibly more useful in a general-purpose sense. Given your other
> choices
> > the 410 would probably provide more variety than the 480. I like the
> 410 so
> > much that I got a second one (for stereo!), but will also be adding
> a second
> > 480 to my system during the BIG SALE.
> >
> > --Adam
>