> From: Elhardt@...
> I don't like to see compromises made either. But when
> somebody is asking for the functionality of the MOTM-320
> LFO to be placed in the Phaser, that is
> going too far.
Agreed. I'm not sure anybody really intended that. Heck, that's what the
320 is for.
> Keep in mind, virtually all modular synths that have phaser
> modules don't provide any internal modulation at all. You are expected
to
> use other modules for that. So the MOTM phaser has already gone beyond
the
> others in that area. The places to spend more money on are the phase
shifter
> itself. As I suggested before, negative feedback. How about a rotatary
> switch to allow the user to choose 4,6,8,10,12 stages of phase shift
Ooh. That sounds cool. I like rotary switches. And, standard MOTM knobs
are big enough to handle the job.
LH