Thanks. I did hear from Ken. Thought it was copied to the list.
After hearing the effect of the graphic EQ on the patchbook drums, I am
going to look into a multi-effect processor. It will be part of my
enhanced recording environment eventually. I have a lot of research to
do on these.
-Richard
Mike Marsh wrote:
>You probably wanted to hear from Ken, but here are a few suggestions
>anyway:
>
> ∗ Roland SE-50 (noisy but cool) or SE-70 (more 'modern')
> ∗ Lexicon sells several budget but great sounding rack devices (MX?)
> ∗ Carvin sells a GREAT unit very cheap
> ∗ Guitar multi-effects (BOSS, Korg, take your pick) work really well
>on synths
>
>Mike
>
>--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
>
>>Can you mention some actual "multi-effect" devices and send links? I'm
>>assuming these are stand-alone processors of the rack-mounted sort.
>>
>>-Richard Brewster
>>
>>Kenneth Elhardt wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>2. There are no MOTM modules currently available for creating complex
>>>formants as required.<<
>>>
>>>Right. Addressing coyoteous here. Some modulars have parametric EQ,
>>>graphic EQ, delay, phaser, chorus, and filter bank modules. MOTM
>>>
>>>
>does not.
>
>
>>>Those are legitimate and much needed modules for doing many things,
>>>
>>>
>so I
>
>
>>>don't consider them outboard gear so much. If you have a multi-effects
>>>device, you may already have most of that stuff already in a single
>>>
>>>
>unit.
>
>
>>>Plus, it is a lot less expensive buying a separate graphic EQ than if
>>>synthtech were to put one behind a panel and sell it. And in the used
>>>market some people are almost giving them away. Plus the EQ can be
>>>
>>>
>removed
>
>
>>>in those patches. The filters could be altered, or other ones added.
>>>Whatever gets you to the sound you want is all that is important in
>>>
>>>
>the end.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>