Maybe true, but... I get lots of FPE panels made, and there is
∗definitely∗ a variation in the thickness of the lettering. It's not
just a matter of paint. I use my previous files as templates, so
there's really no way to chalk it up (ha ha) to setting something
different. I thought for a while that it might only happen to me, but
the engraving on my new Wiard Borg 2 is way overblown compared to that
of my Boogie.
When they're able to pull off 0.4mm, it looks very good. Their
inconsistency has made me consider silkscreening all my panels instead : {
soggy
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "John Loffink" <jloffink@a...> wrote:
>
> They're putting more paint into the engraving, which makes the font
appear
> thicker.
>
> John Loffink
> The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
> The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
> http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > Richard Brewster
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:21 PM
> > To: MOTM List
> > Subject: [motm] Front Panel Express engraving depth
> >
> > Looking at MOTM-102 panel ideas, I notice that a popular engraving
tool
> > choice for lettering is the 0.4mm size. For over a year I have been
> > using the 0.2mm tool exclusively. For a reason I cannot explain, the
> > actual result of the 0.4mm tool became increasingly bold over
time. So
> > much so that the last panels I made with it are a bit coarse looking.
> > The letter boldness of the most recent panels I made with the
0.2mm tool
> > is almost the same as the oldest ones that specified the 0.4mm.
If you
> > are ordering from FPE in the United States, I suggest the lighter
0.2mm
> > tool. The result is more refined. The MOTM-like Font is DIN 1451,
> > 1-stroke.
> >
> > -Richard Brewster
> >
> > http://www.pugix.com
> >
>