I second this. IMO a great idea.
As much fun as it is to drive my MOTM and ACS sequencers from Live
via MIDI I'm longing for "stand-alone" usage of my modular and tape
machines.
i.e. printing a clock (or 2) to my 1" 8 track and then using that to
sequence/compose directly to tape.
I know its old fashioned but... its fun.
On 04.01.2006, at 00:37 Uhr, elle_webb wrote:
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@j...> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that the internal clock is an easy candidate for cutting
>> if more
>> panel space is needed. Most modulars end up with a dozen or more LFOs
>> anyway, and if you look at this module as something that you might
>> want
>> to own several of, daisy-chained, then the clocks on the downstream
>> modules become wasted.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Modularize the module."
>
> It might be interesting to have a more powerful Master clock module
> that could be used to drive S&H's or other modules.
>
> It would be nice to have a clock that could output a variety of
> subdivisions, like 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc, via individual jacks.
> You'd have a rate knob, and then outputs with clocks at various
> subdivisions.
>
> That way doing things like running a couple of S&H's with 3 pulses
> against 4, in sync, would be a piece of cake.
>
> For rhythmic music, having a powerful clock controller seems like it
> would be more useful than having multiple less powerful internal
> clocks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>