Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: RE: [motm] Re: S&H talk

From: "John Loffink" <jloffink@...>
Date: 2006-01-04

Well, if Paul wanted to get really clever on the 102, when a CLKIN is
plugged in the Rate knob could be converted to a divide function on the
incoming clock, rather than a rate for the internal clock.

John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> elle_webb
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:11 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] Re: S&H talk
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, synth1@a... wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The internal clock doesn't seem like it adds much value, and could be
> > > a liability for people that are interested in adding multiple S&H's.
> > >
> >
> > Not if there is a ∗clock out∗ jack :)
> >
>
> In most instances, users would probably want to synchronize events, in
> which case they'll use an external clock, and the controls and output
> jacks for the internal clocks wouldn't be used. Eliminating these
> might free up space or $$ for more useful features.
>
> If users wanted each S&H to run independently, this would still be
> easy with the clock inputs.
>
> So it seems like making this more modular (dropping the clock) might
> free up space for more useful features.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>