>Another ditto. I am now convinced that a quantizer function is too rich
>with possibilities to warrant inclusion in this simple S&H module. Yes,
>it was I who brought it up. I was brainstorming. This collaborative
>design is great. The best ideas stick and the more off-the-wall ideas
>shake out and maybe lead to other module design ideas. A consensus is
>converging that a MOTM-102 should not include noise or quantizing. If
>you take those out, we're left with the remaining good ideas and it is
>simple enough to fit in 1U. Agree? Or do you still want noise or
>quantizing in this little module?
Would like to have...
I like the output correlation. I like the positive/negative edge
trigger switch. I like the infinite hold. I like the shifting (ASR),
especially if it can cascade from one 102 to another 102. I would
also like to have all outputs be able to sample/hold a unique value
when not in ASR mode.
Would not object to having...
Additional white/pink/random outputs, but not at the expense of the
S&H capabilities.
Don't need...
Quantizing. A440 reference tone (just kidding).