Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] Another thought

From: "Adam Schabtach" <adam@...>
Date: 2005-12-31

FWIW: I agree that:

1) using several noise sources sounds different than using one noise source
in several places
2) you shouldn't have to buy a ring mod every time you buy a VCA
3) splitting functionality to create two less-expensive modules is more
desirable than creating one module that does everything.

Just my $0.02 worth, of course.

--Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Haneberg [mailto:phaneber@...]
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:50 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Another thought
>
> My personal preference would be to split this thing up at this point.
> Make a noise source with multiple types of noise outputs including the
> uncertainty source.
> Make a S&H ASR module and
> a quantizer module.
> I'd rather have several lower cost modules than a really expensive single
> module, and I like the idea of splitting things up and making them more
> modular.
>
> The alternative would possibly push this thing beyond 2U unless some of
> the
> functions were left out.
>
> I also agree with Moe about noise sources. If you take two sources and
> pan
> one left and one right it will sound different than one source panned
> center. Having equal energy distributions do not make two sources sound
> the
> same at a given moment in time.
>
> Paul H.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:59 PM
> Subject: [motm] Another thought
>
>
> >I caould do a $50 retail difference by only having 3 outputs, but they
> are
> > 14-bit.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>