And if Paul does it this way, it would be nice to have the noise module
have several sources of uncertainty.
I like using several random low freq. signals to add a just a bit of
randomness to filters and the VCOs.
A very small amount adds a nice depth to a voice.
I built my own low-freq random source but a real MOTM unit would be a
nice addition.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Haneberg [mailto:phaneber@...]
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 6:50 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Another thought
>
>
> My personal preference would be to split this thing up at this point.
> Make a noise source with multiple types of noise outputs
> including the
> uncertainty source.
> Make a S&H ASR module and
> a quantizer module.
> I'd rather have several lower cost modules than a really
> expensive single
> module, and I like the idea of splitting things up and making
> them more
> modular.
>
> The alternative would possibly push this thing beyond 2U
> unless some of the
> functions were left out.
>
> I also agree with Moe about noise sources. If you take two
> sources and pan
> one left and one right it will sound different than one source panned
> center. Having equal energy distributions do not make two
> sources sound the
> same at a given moment in time.
>
> Paul H.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:59 PM
> Subject: [motm] Another thought
>
>
> >I caould do a $50 retail difference by only having 3
> outputs, but they are
> > 14-bit.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~-->
> Know an art & music fan? Make a donation in their honor this
> holiday season!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/VwqHaC/.VHMAA/n1hLAA/VpLolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>