Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Another thought

From: Paul Haneberg <phaneber@...>
Date: 2005-12-31

My personal preference would be to split this thing up at this point.
Make a noise source with multiple types of noise outputs including the
uncertainty source.
Make a S&H ASR module and
a quantizer module.
I'd rather have several lower cost modules than a really expensive single
module, and I like the idea of splitting things up and making them more
modular.

The alternative would possibly push this thing beyond 2U unless some of the
functions were left out.

I also agree with Moe about noise sources. If you take two sources and pan
one left and one right it will sound different than one source panned
center. Having equal energy distributions do not make two sources sound the
same at a given moment in time.

Paul H.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:59 PM
Subject: [motm] Another thought


>I caould do a $50 retail difference by only having 3 outputs, but they are
> 14-bit.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>