My thinking this is not required for subscribers as it is "specialized" to a
degree.
Not a vocoder. Good try!
Paul S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark T <mmt@...>
To: <motm@onelist.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] 1U tall ∗Modules∗??!?
> From: "Mark T" <mmt@...>
>
> Hey Paul,
>
> Is this a "must -have" for us MOTM users? If so, I'd like to see it in the
> standard format 5 Unit Tall, no problem with me if you want to expand it
to
> 4 units wide to get in all the goods.
>
> Could this be the vocoder module?
>
> Aren't all MOTM's - "must have"?
>
> Love that 410!
>
> Mark T
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
> To: MOTM listserv <motm@onelist.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 8:41 PM
> Subject: [motm] 1U tall ∗Modules∗??!?
>
>
> > From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> >
> > Time for an opinion poll:
> >
> > Let's say that a super-ultra-mega-cool module was in in design that
could
> be
> > either 3U wide x 5U tall, or 1U tall by 19" wide.
> >
> > In the 19" wide version, the advantages would be:
> >
> > a) optional "wall-wart" supply for non-MOTM customers
> > b) more features than the 3U wide
> > c) easier to build, due to mechanical reasons
> > d) cost would be probably $30 more. Say $219 kit versus $249 kit in 1U
> tall.
> >
> > I really don't want 2 versions, and right now ∗really∗ tempted to do it
as
> a
> > 1U to get
> > possible more sales.
> >
> > It's more of an effects thing (ie like a '410 is an "effect")
> >
> > Well?
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
> > >
>
> >