You'll notice I used the word 'most,' as in 'most analog modules you'd
want from a synth' as there will always be more. And I didn't see paul
say anywhere that he was going to make a virtual analog synth; the
synergy doesn't quite count. The synergy, the prophet VS/wavestation,
etc are all patently digital synthesizers. What gave you the idea that
paul was going to be doing VA stuff?
-Geoff
Mike Estee wrote:
>
>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Overand wrote:
>
>
>>Am I the only one who lauged here? Analog modelling digital stuff from
>>a company that already provides most analog modules you'd want from a
>>synth...
>>
>>
>
>That's being a bit presumptuous, I can think of few that are missing.
>
>Sorry, I just don't see the utility of a VA (in the classical sense of
>emulating circuits originally designed for opamps) in a modular synth, but
>that's just me.
>
>I'd rather see things like arbitrary waveform generators, delay lines,
>loopers, CV controllable reverbs, plexes, cloud oscillators and other such
>weirdness that doesn't make sense in the analog domain, than
>yet-another-vintage-synth-emulation.
>
>Anyway, people seem to be excited about it so that probably as good a
>reason as any to try it.
>
>--mikes
>
>
>