Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [motm] Modcan in MOTM format... power?

From: Tentochi <tentochi2003@...>
Date: 2004-12-05

I think the design for the joystick is pretty much done. Larry H. did that. MOAJI.

And I do know that Paul has been interested in doing a quad panner in the past.

For effects modules, the de facto spring reverb for the MOTM is the Neural Agonizer. Paul has
stated that he will probably never do a spring reverb. Stooge FPs available. I also still have a
couple for FULL kits available as well if anyone is interested.

For an MOTM analog delay, everyone pretty much uses the Blacet Time Machine. There is a Stooge FP
available for the module as well. BBD in da hizzouse.

For MOTM Frequency Shifter, Paul gave his blessing to Tony K's Encore Electronic Frequency
Shifter.

Any other effects you are looking for?

I can provide links if you are interested. I will send out information on the Neural Agonizer
Spring Reverb kits again on this week.

MOTM, Oakley, Blacet, Tellun, Stooge Ind. (Larry only on this one), CGS, Cyndustries (w/adaptor),
MAP (w/adaptor), Wiard (w/adaptor), Larry B.'s PV-1, and a couple of others all use the compatible
with the MOTM standard as far as I know.

Cheers!
Shemp

> I have to second Ivan's comment. As a (soon to be) new MOTM builder, I chose the system because
> of the innovations in module design that Paul is engaging in now. The joystick and effects
> modules from Modcan have always looked interesting in that nice-to-have kind of way,
>
> But according to their website, the Modcan modules are only powered from a Modcan chassis and
> according to Modularsynth.com, only MOTM and Blacet modules are mutually compatible in their
> power delivery, though they use the same voltage. As a green builder, this might be a naive
> question, but is there a simple way to work around this with a mod and add the MTA connectors &
> cables?
>
> cheers,
> eric

> >This indicates that the MOTM panel format is catching on. >Methinks this is a good thing.
>
> I would agree. There are a number of more "utilitarian" modules such as the quad panner and
> joystick that I would like to have, but probably aren't worth Paul's time. In my opinion I like
> the direction Paul has been heading, with unique filters and modifiers that nobody else seems to
> make.
>
> Ivan


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com