I figured it was too late in the PCB process to move the control. So,
getting the jacks out from underneath it made sense. Maybe everyone does
not agree. It sure frees up more room to add the text "LFO" and "EXT."
However, there is now room for the "0" which is missing. Maybe "LFO" and
"EXT" can now go below or the "0" and "10." What do you think?
I would have picked a slightly differnet jack arrangement with the bottom
row being the IN, EXT MOD, and OUTs with the CVs grouped together in the
other 3 spots. My only rational for that is the convention that is normally
found on MOTM panels.
Larry H
----- Original Message -----
From: John Blacet
To: MOTM
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] StonZ MOTM front panel
The Regen was moved at the suggestion of "a Stooge" because the legend was
too close to the Mod Mix Legend. Looked like crap.
Actually the new position makes more sense as the Regen pot, switch and CV
input are now in a vertical row.
The pots are correctly spaced.
Tentochi wrote:
Regen CV is in the wrong place. It needs to go on the right at the bottom.
Also, the pots appear to be spaced too far apart.
You should strongly consider having Moe design and Stooge Industries
manufacture.
Remember that MOTMers are a different market than than Frac Rackers.
--Shemp
> Some folks wanted to see the Front Panel:
>
> http://www.blacet.com/MOTMfp.pdf
>
> Sorry about the PDF; something is awry in converting CAD to jpg.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
--
Regards,
John Blacet
Blacet Research
http://www.blacet.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Get unlimited calls to
U.S./Canada
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.