Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

----- Original Message -----

From: Greg James

To: Sikorsky ; motm@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 12:11 PM

Subject: RE: [motm] Re: Panning VCAs

Paul,

 

You're approach got me thinking (uh oh). If "both" sides are controlled independently,

then you'd have more control over how the panning occurs. Sometimes, you might not

want a competely "summed" pan - you may want one side or the other to be higher or

lower than it might otherwise be if both sides always summed to 100%. That could be

used for some more natrual or interesting sounding pans, no?

 

-Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Sikorsky [mailto:vulture.squadron@...]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 6:57 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Panning VCAs

hello all,
this got me thinking, so i multed a signal into two VCAs (motm 110) then
used a CGS37 CV Cluster to create the two control voltages, initially i used
an LFO to create the clock pulse and divided this down using an MOTM120R.
Sub 1 output went to the CV cluster voltage input, while Sub 2 output went
to the Modulator input. Alternatively the LFO outputs from an OMS410 we fed
into the CV Cluster

food for thought...

cheers
paul
sheffield
uk