Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] Re: Panning VCAs

From: "Greg James" <gjames@...>
Date: 2004-09-12

Paul,
 
You're approach got me thinking (uh oh). If "both" sides are controlled independently,
then you'd have more control over how the panning occurs. Sometimes, you might not
want a competely "summed" pan - you may want one side or the other to be higher or
lower than it might otherwise be if both sides always summed to 100%. That could be
used for some more natrual or interesting sounding pans, no?
 
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Sikorsky [mailto:vulture.squadron@...]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 6:57 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Panning VCAs

hello all,
this got me thinking, so i multed a signal into two VCAs (motm 110) then
used a CGS37 CV Cluster to create the two control voltages, initially i used
an LFO to create the clock pulse and divided this down using an MOTM120R.
Sub 1 output went to the CV cluster voltage input, while Sub 2 output went
to the Modulator input. Alternatively the LFO outputs from an OMS410 we fed
into the CV Cluster

food for thought...

cheers
paul
sheffield
uk