Dave,
I'm a little confused by the choice of a VCO vs. EG. The 310 VCO costs
almost twice as much as the 800 EG, and their functions are very
different. I don't know what you already have, but if you now own a
VCO, a VCF, a VCA and an EG, a second EG would be a good addition. You
can put one EG on the VCF and the other on the VCA. Get another
MOTM-800 first. Then after that I would look at the MOTM-320 LFO, which
can do double duty as a VCO, and which also can drive the hard sync on
the MOTM-300 you presumably have (and modulate the 300 PWM input too).
-Richard Brewster
J. Larry Hendry wrote:
>My opinion is a second VCO goes a long way before a second EG for harder
>synth sounds just because of hard synth and interval tuning. And, when you
>get uVCO, you can start thinking about a Miniwave. :) But, for acoustic
>sounds, the second EG so you have more control of VCO VCF and VCA envelopes
>might make more sense.
>
>But, I'm just a stooge and am terribly at making any decent acoustic sounds
>with mine. We have some other local experts on that subject. But, hard
>sync is almost like having another filter. :)
>
>Larry
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: David Moylan <dave@...>
>To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:44 PM
>Subject: [motm] Module choice - second VCO or second EG.
>
>
>What are your opinions on the order to pickup these two modules? Second
>VCO (micro) first or second EG?
>
>Thanks.
>
>PS. Chub, I emailed you about joysticks. Did it get through?
>
>Dave Moylan
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>