Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?

From: "John Loffink" <jloffink@...>
Date: 2004-02-08

Yep, if CMS was that concerned about longevity they would have used 1/4"
jacks. You'd think a guy who did so much service on Arp 2600s would know
better. Maybe it is part of a built in semi-retirement plan (snicker).

Nice panel designs, though if you pay attention the normalling (pulse or
sawtooth to PWM on the dual VCO, for instance) is limited and most of the
knobs are small, about the size of the UEG knobs. I wouldn't mind seeing a
little more graphics variety in future MOTM panels, but not at the expense
of panel user interface.

Right now I am really happy that I made the decision to go MOTM. Paul and
Jurgen design the highest quality analog circuits in the business, and
provide those modules at a reasonable, non-boutique cost with exceptional
quality components. I have no doubt that my MOTM will survive long past any
other modulars, including CMS.

John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ivancu@... [mailto:ivancu@...]
>
> You get to pay more money AND get 1/8" jacks. No thanks, I'll pass!
>
> Looks a lot like an Aries (just at first glance).
>
> Ivan
>
>
>