previous by date | index | next by date |
topic list |
> From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>better
> My particular bias is towards features and useability at the expense of
> compactness. It's a modular, dag nabbit! If you are going to put in
> features, allow enough panel space to contain them. Also, IMHO it's
> to have a general purpose standalone module (e.g. a lag processor) thanto
> build a similar dedicated feature into one or more modules (e.g. glide ona
> sequencer module).it's
>
> Everyone has different opinions, but MOTM is a large format design, so
> going to be hard to get a 5 or 10 space portable rack with a zillionI agree 100%. I love the "space" of MOTM panels with the BIG knobs and
> features.