Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

In a message dated 1/8/04 10:24:38 PM Central Standard Time,
mmarsh@... writes:

> Right, VC-able is what I meant to say. And I agree with Richard
> that the 320 is in fact the King of LFOs. But for a monosynth type
> setup, th 390 would be enough (?)

Another thing to consider is that the 390 has two LFOs in a 1U width, vs.
the single LFO of the 2U width MOTM-320. Perhaps in a smaller system, the extra
LFO and smaller width of the MOTM-390 uLFO would be more beneficial?

Andrew