Right, VC-able is what I meant to say. And I agree with Richard
that the 320 is in fact the King of LFOs. But for a monosynth type
setup, th 390 would be enough (?)
Mike - now re-learning how to type
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@n...> wrote:
> I think Mike meant to say that one of the two LFOs in the 390 is
> ∗voltage controllable∗. Only the 320 has the sync feature.
>
> My recomendation on module selection is to start with one of each
> different type of module and decide later, after using them, which
ones
> you want duplicates of. I have two each of a lot of MOTM modules,
> including the 300, 310, 320, and 390. The 300 and 310 are the
same high
> quality VCO, but the 300 adds more features. Now I think the 320
and
> 390 LFO modules are really quite different from each other. The
390 is
> great for your basic LFO needs. And the 320 is in a class by
itself,
> the "king" of LFOs. So I suggest one of each to start.
>
> One more piece of advice. You are very likely to end up with a
lot more
> modules than you thought you would ever get. :) Thank goodness
these
> are ∗modular∗. The case and power supply options will work
themselves
> out as you grow your synth. Just plan on growing.
>
> -Richard Brewster
>
> Mike Marsh wrote:
>
> >3) The 390 is a great LFO! You'll be happy with it. The
advantage
> >the 390 has over the 320 is that it has two separate LFOs, and
one is
> >sync-able.
> >
> >More food for thought!
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >