Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] 440 compared to Pro-One

From: inform3r <inform3r@...>
Date: 2003-12-13

Only the later Prophets (revs 3.x) used the same filter as the Pro One.
One of the reasons early Prophets are coveted is because they made extensive
use of the SSM chips as opposed to the CEMs that the later models had.

-John

on 12/13/03 1:06 AM, foraxx at omgemag@... wrote:

> How would the 440 compare to a SCI Pro-One's filter? I read the 440
> is based on the Prophet 5 Rev. 2 and the Pro-One is basically a
> single voice of a Prophet 5, so it would stand to reason that a 440
> sounds similar to a Pro-One's filter. I'm not knowledgable on the
> different revisions of the Prophets, so my logic may be incorrect.
> Hopefully someone can clarify this.
> -Jim
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

--
ELECTRO:DISCO:RETRO:FUTURE
http://www.hongkongcounterfeit.com