Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter group question

From: "Tony Karavidas" <tony@...>
Date: 2003-11-05

One of the reasons for the knobs to be in the location they are currently in
is the fact that I created a grid of knob positions on the UEG, and these
fall within that grid as well. So it's not arbitrary. It wasn't arbitrary in
the UEG either. I was trying to maximize the spacing when trying to fit 8
knobs and a jack in a column.


Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: elle_webb [mailto:elle_webb@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:35 PM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter group question

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Karavidas" <tony@e...> wrote:
> My inclination is to leave it basically as show here:
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com/cont_fs1.html

If a panel is going to diverge from the MOTM standard, it ought to be
distinctive, improve functionality, or be a necessary compromise.

This panel looks arbitrarily different to my eyes, and the smaller knobs
don't make sense. This module cries out to be "stooged"!


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy
Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer
at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/VpLolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/