> I'm not clear on how this generate revenue for me. Is this like the
> 'Intel Inside' sticker? What
> benefit would Doepfer see if they said "Paul Schreiber think's we are
> great!"
This would be the "crazy" part of crazy talk ;) At least amongst the
small group of people who I've shown the MOTM to, they pretty much
universally agree that your synth sounds really, really nice. I think
the cynthia example is a fine one.
>> I want a musical delay with full CV control/syncing of time/feedback
>> parameters.
>
> Well, this is something that is non-trival from the SW side. Heck, you
> can get DSP eval boards
> from ∗Mouser∗, fer cryin' out loud! But the SW and seeming endless
> listening tests ("it doesn't
> sound as good as my (filling in the blank with any of 4000 possible
> answers, from Lexicon to free
> VST plugins)......").
Hmm, maybe because I'm a software engineer that part doesn't seem to
bother me too much. On the other hand, those DSP eval boards are a
little to expensive for me to bolt into a stooge panel and call it a
day.
> I guess I'm spoiled, as I have a Eventide DSP7000 and a tc electronic
> M3000, both fully
> programmable in real-time (over MIDI). It's also a matter of
> economics: if me or someone else is
> writing algorithms for 7 months and I sell say 60 of them, it has to
> make $$$ sense. Because
> there's ALWAYS the ''but I like my (any one of 4000 possible answers)
> better!"
I have an eclipse, and access to a 7000 too. Neither of these boxes
integrates into the signal and control path of my modular worth a damn.
They are all post processing equipment. Way overpowered for adding a
little delay to one input of a '440. This is the crux of the problem.
I don't think this theoretical module should try to compete with an
M3000 or an Orville. It doesn't need multitapped echo chambers with
variable room size and a preset called "Mountain Goat 3" It just needs
delay time, feedback, and a low pass. All CV controllable.
Maybe I'll pick up a 56k eval board with my next mouser order ;)
--mikes