Not really on topic, but maybe amusing:
In Germany we had a big advertising for BASF compact cassettes
in the last days before Minidisc, and finally CDRs, took over.
With much ado, their message was
"very close to the CD - 99.9% noise-free !!"
Sounds impressive, but if you assume they were right,
and do the maths, this means just 60dB SNR.
Not that the musical instruments business would be better:
The Moog/Bode Frequency shifter was advertised as having
less than 0.1% of noise. Once again, that's just 60dB.
(Not bad for a FS, btw.)
Oh and one last thing: I prefer a ∗good∗ (new, heavy-vinyl)
LP to a CD any time. But if I'd talk about "LP quality", no one
would know what I mean.
JH.
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: The Old Crow <
oldcrow@...>
An: <
motm@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003 01:09
Betreff: Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
>
> I just think Paul wanted to avoid saying something like 96dB dynamic
> range, which is far less marketable to the same audience of prospective
> buyers. (eg, the ones that go, "duuuh whats a dB?" ;)
>
> Crow
>
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Adam Schabtach wrote:
>
> > I recognize that "CD quality" has become a marketing term which carries
> > certain connotations, but as a technical description it doesn't mean a
> > whole lot to me when applied to a synthesizer module.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>