Mike Marsh wrote:
>Nice, neat little rows for nice neat litle music. Yummy. Nicely
organized, no accidents! Neat!<
Music is organized sound, so why shouldn't the instrument be
organized? (BTW, never sweat about typos on the net--you'll go mad!)
>Maybe we should ask the IEEE to adjudicate the standard?<
That's MY job! :-)
>Knowing where your modules are: one dollar. Knowing how to use
them: $10. Arranging them the way that works for you: priceless.<
Heh.
Think of a modular synthesizer as a kitchen. Does it make sense to
put forks in one drawer, knives in another, and spoons in cupboard?
Or does it make more sense to have all eating utensils side-by-side
in nice neat little compartments? Again, it is all about
efficiency. Having pots in one place, knives in another, bowls in
another, etc. frees the cook to concentrate on the meal instead of
wasting time searching for tools.
A synthesizer should be equally ∗mis en place.∗
Clustering ADSRs together is like clustering mixing bowls together.
So what if the synthesist might have to use a 6 foot patch cord every
now and again to reach one? We are dealing with 10V p-p signals, so
induced noise is NOT an issue.
I'll bet Robert Rich's kitchen is organized. Wonder if his synth is?
Alas, my modular is the ONLY thing that's organized in this pad.
And no, this isn't a flame, though I rather enjoy a heated debate.
Sure, people can arrange their modules anyway they like, but I think
it is important for newbies to understand the value of clustering--
it will save them a lot of wasted time and effort.
Think I'll make a bumper sticker that says, "Carlos Clusters" :-)
Then again, that sounds like some kind of candy.
johnm