Yep...SUB GAIN and SUB OUT.
Paul S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Bradley <
daveb@...>
To:
motm@onelist.com <
motm@onelist.com>
Date: Monday, October 11, 1999 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: [motm] Mixers....again.
>From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
>
>> >When we originally discussed this, you were not happy with the idea of a
>> >gain pot that was dead part of the time. What changed your mind?
>>
>>
>> I decided that this was the best compromise. And I don't like dual pots.
>>
>
>I agree. Any ideas on how to clue in the user that the pot doesn't
currently
>do anything? I think maybe all that's needed is to tie the pot to the
>switching jack with the labelling, maybe call the pot "Sub Mix" and the
jack
>"Sub Out"?
>
>Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 10:32 AM
>> To: motm@onelist.com
>> Subject: Re: [motm] Mixers....again.
>>
>>
>> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>>
>> >
>> >Sounds like a reasonable design. To do anything more (with pan, for
>> >instance), you'd have to go to a wider panel.
>>
>>
>> This is ∗not∗ a low-end Mackie. It's just for mixing signals
>> within a patch.
>>
>> >
>> Paul S.
>>
>> >
>
>>