> >When we originally discussed this, you were not happy with the idea of a
> >gain pot that was dead part of the time. What changed your mind?
>
>
> I decided that this was the best compromise. And I don't like dual pots.
>
I agree. Any ideas on how to clue in the user that the pot doesn't currently
do anything? I think maybe all that's needed is to tie the pot to the
switching jack with the labelling, maybe call the pot "Sub Mix" and the jack
"Sub Out"?
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 10:32 AM
> To: motm@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Mixers....again.
>
>
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> >
> >Sounds like a reasonable design. To do anything more (with pan, for
> >instance), you'd have to go to a wider panel.
>
>
> This is ∗not∗ a low-end Mackie. It's just for mixing signals
> within a patch.
>
> >
> Paul S.
>
> >