Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: 380 and 390 LFOs (was: points clarification)

From: "Frank Vanaman" <fvanaman@...>
Date: 2003-01-31

Hi Y'all-

I whole-heartedly agree with Larry's thought. I did the same thing, one 380
and one 390. That's a whole boat-load of LFOs in 2U of width. My reasoning
was similar to Larry's: I wanted at least one to be VC'able, but I'm also
always using a few for free running purposes. ∗AND∗ I didn't really want to
take up 2U of space with a single LFO, albeit a fuller-featured one. The
price is nice at $99 for each of the two, too!

I'm pleased with the choice...

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:55 PM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Points clarification

Yes, I have a thought. You can never have too many LFOs. :) And, an 320
is a bit of overkill every time you need an LFO. 380 makes sense if you want
complex waveforms. The 390 makes sense if you still need some voltage
control. I got one of each. :)

Larry H