Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: Recording software

From: "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@...>
Date: 2002-12-05

∗sigh∗ I have both, and prefer Cool Edit Pro, based on the same
criteria. But I use SF all the time, as well. I have Strats and Les
Pauls and use them at different times, too.

(Cool Edit Pro 2.0 vs SF 6.0)

Mike

--- In motm@y..., Neil Bradley <nb@s...> wrote:
> > Audio Editors are like text editors; you'll probably hear lots of
> > religious fervor about one or another. Pick one and jam!
>
> Religious fervor aside, I've used Cool Edit Pro and Sound Forge 6,
and for
> me SF 6 is head and shoulders above Cool Edit Pro in sound quality
in the
> EQ, effects, and pitch/time shifting. It's quite a bit more spendy,
> though...
>
> -->Neil
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Neil Bradley In the land of the blind, the one eyed man
is not
> Synthcom Systems, Inc. king - he's a prisoner.
> ICQ #29402898