Hello, all!
OK - My two cents. Canare cable. Back when I was a 'hero' Second
Engineer at Skyline Recorders in Old Topanga Cyn. in Southern California,
we upgraded our cables to accomodate Bob Dylan for his "Knocked Out
Loaded" album. We went from some standard Belden co-ax to shiny, new
Canare Quad cable, where you get a twisted pair each for the Hot & Cold
lines (and braided shielding, too). I was in charge of assembling these
cables, since I was the only one with enough soldering/wiring experience
to do so.
Wiring the cables was easy. Instead of a single wire to the Hot or
Cold, a twisted pair was soldered to the terminal, and covered with
heatshrink tubing. The wires in each of the twisted pair were very fine,
supposedly suitable for transmitting high frequencies, and the shield
weaving was robust. Everything was insulated with heatshrink, the cables
were color-coded as to their length... a Pro-fess-ional job, if'n I do
say so me'self.
We did an A/B comparison with some of our old mic. cables and the new
Canare ones, and the difference was noticeable. The Canares were
"half-a-hush" quieter (Due to the twisted pair leads for each of the signal
paths, I believe) than the old stuff. While I won't go as far as saying
that Monster Cable is far superior to Rat Shark 16-gauge zipcord, I can
say, with impunity, that my ears heard a tangible difference in the
quietness of Canare cable, compared to the old Belden mic. cables.
At the time, the Canare stuff cost us the ass-tronomical price of $300
(mid-'80's) for about 100 ft., but it was worth it. I'm a BIG
supporter of the Quad (?) cable, after that.
As I said, my two cents...
Dave Garfield, synthead
PS - Paul, You 'de MAN!!
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site