| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list |
Personally I think it would be a good timefor a vote on which Module(s) should be next.
Man would this list really get somepostings then!!
If someone more “in the know”than myself could list what is currently up forconsideration then that would be most helpful.
As a secondary – Has it been decidedthat the “950” will replace the 900.
I ask this because my first cabinet isnearly full, and I will be planning for the 500 modules (mmmmGravy)
So I don’t want to buy a 900 andfind it cant drive the 500’s
Regards
Steve M.
-----OriginalMessage-----
From: Paul Schreiber[mailto:synth1@...]
Sent: 16 October 2002 17:18
To: MOTM listserv
Subject: [motm] New activityversus Old stuff
Please understand all thisnew activity in some cases has been quietly going on for MONTHS
between myself and others. I can't possible do allof this by myself, so there are about 5 other
folks pitching in at various levels ofinvolvement. This is what I wanted MOTM to become: a
"design by committee" sort of thing,avoiding the old joke (a battleship is a rowboat designed by
committee).
There are many factors that by chance "linedup" over the last 2 months and then the end-game is
trying to show as much as possible at NAMM, evenif it's a prototype (heck, many others show
EMPTY CASES at NAMM under glass displays).
Also, I have to 'fill the pipeline' for next year,and the reality is new module sales drive the
business forward. Although at some point you∗have∗ to slow down or you have 70 different modules
and the nightmare of keeping up with all thatdiverse inventory.
I haven't "forgotten" the '130 or the'480. I also haven't "forgotten" the ~350+ module on
∗current∗ backlog, either. In fact, the last 2days I spent most of my time building '800s
(ZZzzzzz...).
And...there are modules still in R&D notmentioned (about 4 of them). SO already, next year looks
close to 12 new, shipping modules.
Lastly, I need to do all the R&D NOW while I'mon...errr.....sabbatical (cough cough) and have
the 'time'.
Paul S.