I meant 490, but I can't wait for the 480, too!
--- In motm@y..., "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@s...> wrote:
> Wow, tough question. The 410 is an absolute must-have in my
> opinion. It is so versatile, you will rapidly not want to live
> without it.
>
> The 420 has a very particular character that I love, and it
distorts
> nicely when overloaded. the 440 is beautiful, too, but it doesn't
> always works distorted.
>
> The 480 is completely amazing. You get a real bouncy, moogy sound
> out of it. Of all, the 480 is less versatile, but definately
> has 'that sound'.
>
> The 120 is also a very multi-faceted module. You can use it as a
> straight 'octaver' (but down to ∗4∗ octaves!). You can make it
ring
> modulate the octaves to produce really weird timbres. And you can
> use it as a kind-of sequencer.
>
> Yep. They are all must-haves...I'd hate to have to choose!
>
> Mike
>
> --- In motm@y..., "auddog33" <matthew_macdonald@u...> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new to your group and have just begun work on my MOTM
synth.
> > I've just finished my cabinet and power supply and expect my
first
> > shipment of modules any day now. My cabinet can hold 20 rack-
> spaces
> > worth of modules, and my current plan includes 13 modules. I
will
> > definiately be building the 440 filter and would like to include
> > another but I'm not sure which one. My question is: has anyone
> > heard/used all of Paul's filters and prefer one over the other?
> > Also, is the sub-octave multiplexer a must-have module?
> >
> > I welcome any/all advice. Thanks!
> >
> > Matt