Putting the TM in MOTM format was one of the coolest things to do
for my rack (I also kept one in Blacet format). It's not just
delay; there's also comb filtering and other modulation
possibilities. It ∗really∗ expands the palette and offends no
analog sensibility...
Que pasa with the uVCO? Mine is working great (and sounding lovely)
and I have another on order. Tuning problems (some went out with
the wrong cap value)?
Mike
--- In motm@y..., "Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)" <noise@A...> wrote:
> We understand; it was the time machine shooting you back to the
days when you hadn't learned to spell yet. ;)
>
> Oddly, I've already recieved and built my 390 and 490 (vunderbar--
both of them!), but am still dragging my butt on the Time Machine.
Gotta order parts. And my microVCO is acting funny. :(
>
> --PBr
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmarsh100 [mailto:mmarsh@s...]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:58 AM
> To: motm@y...
> Subject: [motm] Re: 390 & 490
>
>
>
> possetion? ∗sigh∗
>
> --- In motm@y..., "mmarsh100" <mmarsh@s...> wrote:
> > It's very nice, worth the wait. I know that's easy to say now
> that
> > I have one, but I was in possetion of one two months ago and had
> to
> > give it back! Just now I have in a patch through the TM. Yummy!
> >
> >
> > --- In motm@y..., John Blacet <john@b...> wrote:
> > > Still waiting for my 490; guess the backlog is a neverending
> > story...;>