Really greay comments, and echo my experience as well. Not just
clean output, but BAD ASS tone!
Mike
--- In motm@y..., "jd990exp" <JD990Exp@h...> wrote:
> That was me posting on sonicstate.
>
> I work for a house record label, and the accumulated instruments
here
> are pretty extensive. I brought a lot of my stuff in, which was a
> rack-mounted OB8, the Pulse / Drehbank combo, a Nord modular,
> MKS80/MPG80, and of course the MOTM, which right now stands at
about
> 15 modules.
>
> check out our website at www.wavemusic.com. there's even a
picture
> of me there, somewhere! No equipment on the site, though. It's a
> closed (meaning no outside clients) facility, so we don't even
> mention that we have a studio. Even though we make house, this is
a
> collective of synth-enthusiasts who have been collecting for a
> while. francois K, who owns the label, has mixed Erasure, JM
Jarre,
> Kraftwerk, and Depeche Mode amoung others.
>
> We have a release schedule, usually about four 12" records a
months,
> of which about three or four remixes and maybe one or two original
> sides are done here. Yes, the MOTM wins hands down.
>
> It's big, it's clean (inside and out) and it RECALLS! we can
repatch
> it and come close to how it was before it got normalled!
AWESOME!
> Also, recording 24-bit Protools the noisefloor is a problem with
the
> older machines. And the MOTM has a certain 'feel' which
experienced
> engineers and dance-music enthusiasts just seem to gravitate
towards.
>
> Excellent, excellent synth. Honestly, I liked bringing it in just
to
> show everyone how much better it was than that old, maintenance-
heavy
> vintage stuff. Now with the frequency shifter coming out, I can
put
> it next to the Bode and really stir things up!