Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Re: MOTM 800-EG

From: Adam Schabtach <adam@...>
Date: 2002-05-10

> Indeed if anyone is reconsidering an 800 order, that would be
> unwise. This EG kicks ass.

I recently received the four -800 kits that I purchased as part of my first
MOTM order. I've built one but haven't had a chance to even power it up. Do
I have any second thoughts about these modules based on what I've read here?
Absolutely not. OTOH I might wait to start building the other three until
after Paul has tinkered for awhile. :-)

Paul, I'd vote that you don't fix the
decay-acts-like-attack-when-sustain-is-10 bug. That sounds more like a
feature to me. The decay parameter really has no meaning when the sustain is
10, so if it does something unusual in this circumstance, that sounds like
behavior that might be useful. Essentially it's another attack contour, and
we can always use different contours from one modulation source.

--Adam