Hi.
I made in my sequencer a gate out and invert gate out , and I connect the
gate out to the GATE jack on the 800 and the inverted gate out to the TRIG
jack and the result is a full ADSR .
I must say that now when it is full ADSR you can fill how amazing this
envelope is compared to other manufactures.
thanx
Gur Milstein
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Schreiber <
synth1@...>
To:
Elhardt@... <
Elhardt@...>;
motm@yahoogroups.com<
motm@yahoogroups.com>
Date: éåí ùéùé 10 îàé 2002 14:54
Subject: [motm] MOTM-800 EG
#1: May it has an issue, but you are NOT HELPING by spewing "It's fatally
flawed". THINK first.
OK, it has an issue with attack below a certain point.
#2: I will look into this. It will be next week. In the meantime, PLEASE
don't spew this
everywhere. Well, OK do, torpedo MOTM and end it for everyone. I am SERIOUS!
Stuff like this, in
the "wrong hands" WILL cause panic and end it. Is that what you want?
#3: Like I've said 10 times: use a MOTM-820. Repeat for #11: use a MOTM-820
for now. Because all
you need are "organ" envelopes, which are A-R (no S or D). Sustain "level"
is then CV MOD of the
'110. This is a "work around" but a SOLUTION.
#4: Is there an "easy fix"? Maybe, maybe NOT. Even the "easiest" fix is
unsoldering and
resoldering parts. This may not be so "easy" to some people. Then what? I
have over 300 EGs in
the field. The only solution that would make financial sense is a
board-level (or for some
smaller subset of assembled users, unit-level) replacement at my cost +
postage. This is for the
people that would request it, as for 4 years the "fatal flaw" has elluded
everyone.
This would of course delay EVERYTHING: the new VCAs, the 500 series, the
480. If say I need to
replace 100 EGs, then I would guess 2 full months to redesign, test, kit and
ship. Why does this
sound bad to me?
Paul S.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/