> Anyway, it's Paul's business/hobby and, of course, he can run it as he
> sees fit. Maybe I'm just after a little more 'planning structure' than is
> allowable by such a business. (And I keep looking at that 2U 'hole' where
> I plan to put the 130 ...)
> Jeff
Paul has ∗always∗ stressed that they way he has kept his "hobby" going is to
run it as a business (as opposed to others that have killed the hobby by NOT
running it as a business). It seems like keeping your loyal (and new)
customers happy makes the most business sense (especially in this case). It
also seems like JH will be helping out with this project quite a bit too.
I will buy a minimum of 2 '130s to begin with (as Larry said he will too, 1
of Jeff) and will probably buy several more after that. This is NOT true
for the 500 series. I hope the urgency to get the 500 series out (or the
micro series?) is NOT in response to one or two naysayers out there. Even
if there are a bunch of esoteric MOTM modules created, the system will still
need VCAs.
I don't understand quad panners well enough unfortunately, but I do know
what they can provide. Will the '130s be able to create quad panning???
As always, I will buy whatever Paul releases.
Loyal MOTM Customer/Supporter/(Ab)user,
Shemp