Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner

From: "Thomas White" <djthomaswhite@...>
Date: 2002-04-20

This Looks good for me Larry, good idea. Anyone else care to comment?
 
Thomas "I vote for the gain pot too" White
----- Original Message -----
From: J. Larry Hendry
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner

Or (for discussion):
L, 1, 2
3, 4, 5
6, 7, 8,
S, H,G

L & H obvious, S = switch G = Gain that some feel we need. (still have 8
pots on PCBs.
Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: mate_stubb <mate_stubb@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner


>>>>
Personally, I voted for the layout, not necessarily the assignment of
which control is in which location. I think this could be improved
on. Ideas?
<<<<

Well, there are two existing examples to choose from:

1. The Moog filterbank starts with low bands at the top and works its
way down thus:

1  2
3  4
5  6
7  8

2. Desk EQs start at the bottom and go up, albeit in a single column:

7  8
5  6
3  4
1  2

3. Then you have vertical orientation possibilities:

1  5
2  6
3  7
4  8

4. and

4  8
3  7
2  6
1  5

For examples 1 and 3, I'd put LP at the top left and HP at the bottom
left, reversing their positions for examples 2 and 4. That's about
the best you can do, given the constraints of the layout.

Moe





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.