Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner

From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
Date: 2002-04-19

Personally, I voted for the layout, not necessarily the assignment of which
control is in which location. I think this could be improved on. Ideas?
Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: rogerpellegrini <pellegrini_roger@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:06 PM
Subject: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner


In view of the obvious fact that my ideas are not shared by the
majority, I take up the mantle of the irritant in the oyster that
(hopes) to contribute to the pearl and dutifully point out the
various peculiarities of the winning design:

(1) Whereas the "band" knobs increase in cutoff frequency as one goes
from the top to the bottom of the panel, the lowpass knob (presumably
with the lowest cutoff freq) is at the bottom and the highpass knob
is at the top!

(2) The highpass knob's cutoff freq is close to that of band 8, but
is diagonally across the panel from it (as far as you can get).

(3) The lowpass knob's cutoff freq is close to that of band 1, but is
a panel's height (far) away from it.

In any case, as I'm not even a potential customer for this module,
I'll shut up...I use the old Moog 907 (not the "A", but the original
R.A. Moog filterbank) which has a horizontal layout over a vast
expanse of wasted panel space! yippee

Best regards,
Roger





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/