Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: FW: [motm] MOTM-450 peek

From: "thomas white" <djthomaswhite@...>
Date: 2002-04-12

Its not the grid but the 2 knobs that will be between other jackas and
cables if this is placed between say, 2 440 VCF's. Just my 2 cents. I really
don't see why the 2 lowest pots can't be moved to the column with the LED's.
I would go for the Moog looking 4 space too.

Thomas White

PS. (Chris Parker) Don't let yourself slip on the Encore UEG because of how
it looks. Its an awesome module and really adds to the MOTM features. Even
if this modules comes out as shown in the JPG, will you not buy it because
of the 2 lowest pots?


>From: "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@...>
>To: "'motm@yahoogroups.com'" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: FW: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:04:46 -0400
>
>
>I'm happy with the layout. I agree that we need to respect, but be
>flexible,
>with the 'grid.' It's makes more sense to cheat a few sixteenths than to go
>to 4u, that's for sure.
>
>Maybe future MOTM modules should even "creep" over to this new grid...? I
>know that will cause a lot of screaming, not least of which from Paul, but
>is it worth considering?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mate_stubb [mailto:mate_stubb@...]
>Sent: Friday, 12 April, 2002 10:06 AM
>To: motm@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
>
>HA HA HA!
>
>I knew when Paul and I laid this one out that no two people could
>agree on the layout. You should see some of the other designs I've
>done already. My personal favorite is the 4U version laid out exactly
>like the Moog 907. I'll do another couple of versions tonight to run
>up the flagpole. Then we can have a vote.
>
>RE: LP and HP - Ken is correct. There are 8 peaking bands in the
>middle of the spectrum, tuned for maximum musical effect (I don't
>know the frequencies, perhaps JH can chime in here). The LP knob
>controls a different frequency passing everything BELOW the lowest
>peaking band, and HP passes everything ABOVE the highest peaking
>band. They are not tuned however to the exact same freq. as the
>nearest peaking band. Just like a multiband console EQ conceptually,
>not in terms of operation and filter type, but in terms of how the
>bands are laid out.
>
>Note that this will NOT fit on a 2U panel. There are 10 knobs, 2
>jacks, a switch and an LED. Also, I hope people will not freak out
>about 5 pots in a row, or 1/8" less space between pots. It really is
>the best layout ergonomically IMO. We shouldn't be slaves to the
>format, but make it work for us in nonstandard situations. Also, I'd
>point out that the bottom knobs are not in fact 'getting down in the
>jacks'. If there is a module below, the only thing there will be more
>knobs!
>
>Moe
>
>




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx