Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM Flanger?

From: "jhaible" <jhaible@...>
Date: 2002-04-11

> > It is killer and very useful but I should point out that it is limited
> > to lower frequencies.
>
> That's not necessarily a bad thing...
>
> > A typical flanger would use a 512 or 1024 BBD and
> > offer delays less than 1mS.
>
> Actually the delay time in the MXRs I've got goes up to around 5ms or so,
> and sweeps back down to a hair above 1ms.

There's a slight misunderstanding: small delay time means sweeping ∗up∗.
With long BBDs you get flanging in the lower range only. For "full range"
flanging you need a short BBD line (like 512 ... 1024 steps), kust as John
said.

JH.